Thank you for the insightful editorial concerning public salary increases. As I read the two articles about salary increases, I tried to swallow hard and move on. I don’t like to sound like a complainer. But after reading your editorial, I feel compelled to write. It’s difficult to write a letter which takes issue with the salaries of friends and neighbors. I want to make it clear that it’s not a personal issue with people holding these positions. As stated, cost of-living raises and merit pay increases, as well as steps to equalize, are all legitimate matters. However, I am a member of the other group discussed in your editorial — the ones who have had wage freezes for the last three years, no cost-of-living increases, increased insurance costs, hour reductions, and increases in fuel costs, fees, and taxes. I love my job for what it’s about. And, yes, I would even keep it if there were more wage freezes. I respect the work of the public employee. I’m just not sure it’s three times more valuable than what I do. I can’t imagine all the intricate demands of the city administrator’s position, but would it take four of me to complete them? Again, let me stress that I have no issues with the people in the public positions. I realize it’s important to be competitive to attract qualified applicants, and I realize that good work should be rewarded. However, with all due respect, perhaps it’s time to examine the widening of wage discrepancies in our community in the midst of a tightening economic environment.Janice FickLuverne